Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:26

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Space humbles the SEAL-doctor-astronaut | On the ISS this week June 9-13, 2025 - Space
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot - Yahoo
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any straight men had a gay experience in the past? What was it and how did you feel?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Bethenny Frankel Reveals Her Teenage Daughter Bryn's Reaction to Her SI Swimsuit Look - People.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why is only the left side of my vagina bleeding, on and off?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Winners, losers from NASCAR Cup weekend at Michigan International Speedway - NBC Sports
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.